Network / A point of departure

A thought, connected.

Original replies are recorded connections. Shared projects and topics are editorial paths through the selected archive.

Jack Butcher /

Some new wireframe sketches informed by our semiperfect concept, and true to the invisible grid of the original piece: 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 4, 1, 0 https://t.co/JTs2anJ25M

Original on X ↗Read in context →

Source and context

Exact text from the November 2025 account export. Dates are UTC. This is a selected post; other replies and attachments may be outside this view. Historical rules and figures describe the time of writing.

These are selected development notes from 7-10 January 2023, not the final protocol. The unnamed visual reference in the second post is left unnamed here; no attribution is inferred from a hint.

Checks: an image becomes a set of rules
RulesParticipation

Project documentation: Checks · VV Rare

Connections around the selected postYOU ARE HERE8 January 2023012023-01-08022023-01-09032023-01-07042023-01-07052023-01-07062024-03-21072025-01-10082025-09-30
Solid line: original reply. Dotted line: a shared reading record, project or editorial topic.

Choose a number, or follow a post below.

Follow a connection

8 paths from here
  1. 01 / Same selected reading record

    Recruited the legendary @jalil_eth & @traf to build some proper tech for the next round. Below courtesy of the giga talented @traf (all this animation is done in-browser)

    Follow this thought →
  2. 02 / Same selected reading record

    @jalil_eth @traf Current working mechanic (not final): Burn your edition for an on-chain original. Burn 2 originals for the next smallest edition original. 80 > 40 > 20 > 10 > 5 > 4 > 1 Stop wherever you like.

    Follow this thought →
  3. 03 / Same selected reading record

    @visualizevalue @naval In my agency art director days, I always used to start with wikipedia if I was trying to find a creative angle on something that was rooted in truth. Full transparency, the 80 checks in the original piece were not int…

    Follow this thought →
  4. 04 / Project: Checks

    This is not what we are going to do, but an important precedent to recognize. Next steps for Checks — checking technical feasibility on a few things, and double checking some math. Will be back to share soon, thanks for reading.

    Follow this thought →
  5. 05 / Project: Checks

    A lengthier detour than planned, correction below: The majority of the market opted for the physical version.

    Follow this thought →
  6. 06 / Editorial topic: Rules

    after careful consideration we're going to adjust the mechanism to only allow for one opepen to be opted-in to a single set at a time currently there's a "waterfall" type logic where you can opt into multiple, but it's distorting signal num…

    Follow this thought →
  7. 07 / Editorial topic: Participation

    I’ve been responding to the platform constraints of Rodeo through a collection of 26 pieces capturing its dynamics, each minted with unique imagery (below left). Upon discovering that tokens could be updated to point to new images, the orig…

    Follow this thought →
  8. 08 / Editorial topic: Participation

    $rounds is an erc20 with a max supply of 1,482 indivisible tokens it will be claimable by all gas wars holders (500 tokens) and all failed gas wars minters (982 wallets)

    Follow this thought →

← Find another starting point