Network / A point of departure

A thought, connected.

Original replies are recorded connections. Shared projects and topics are editorial paths through the selected archive.

Jack Butcher /

A lengthier detour than planned, correction below: The majority of the market opted for the physical version. https://t.co/9hpqnvmQUk

Original on X ↗Read in context →

Source and context

Exact text from the November 2025 account export. Dates are UTC. This is a selected post; other replies and attachments may be outside this view. Historical rules and figures describe the time of writing.

The first post contains a count that the author corrects in the following posts. It is preserved to show the sequence, not as a reliable supply figure. HENI’s project record is linked from the Context page for the historical mechanism.

Checks: a stated precedent and a correction

Project documentation: Checks

Connections around the selected postYOU ARE HERE7 January 2023012023-01-07022023-01-07032023-01-07042023-01-07052023-01-07062023-07-17072023-12-08082024-04-08
Solid line: original reply. Dotted line: a shared reading record, project or editorial topic.

Choose a number, or follow a post below.

Follow a connection

8 paths from here
  1. 01 / A reply to this post

    This is not what we are going to do, but an important precedent to recognize. Next steps for Checks — checking technical feasibility on a few things, and double checking some math. Will be back to share soon, thanks for reading.

    Follow this thought →
  2. 02 / The post this replies to

    The supply stays the "same" but the market reveals its preference for each medium in the process. (Numbers above are apparently not correct, collection is split across a couple of chains/not displaying perfectly on OS, anyone who knows actu…

    Follow this thought →
  3. 03 / Same selected reading record

    If you have been around NFTs for a while, you'll recall Damian Hirst's "The Currency" — which worked like this: Burn the NFT, get the physical, or keep the NFT, and the physical gets burned. Of the original 10,000, there are 1,846 NFTs left…

    Follow this thought →
  4. 04 / Project: Checks

    @visualizevalue @naval In my agency art director days, I always used to start with wikipedia if I was trying to find a creative angle on something that was rooted in truth. Full transparency, the 80 checks in the original piece were not int…

    Follow this thought →
  5. 05 / Project: Checks

    @visualizevalue @naval While I think this would make a great artistic statement, it leaves the possibility open for someone to burn the art they purchased and get nothing in return. It's the original piece, sliced in to 80 1/1s — distribute…

    Follow this thought →
  6. 06 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    elements monoprint claim is now live (site will only ask you for a signature, no transactions required) nfts will now reflect claim status (single) vs. (pair) thank you for your support and your patience, means more than I can convey on twi…

    Follow this thought →
  7. 07 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    oviators is a collaboration w/ @SalvinoArmati minting on base for .11 eth for the next 72 hours to determine final supply an nft that will be redeemable for a physical pair of oviators in q1 2024 on redemption your token will transform into…

    Follow this thought →
  8. 08 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    @SalvinoArmati On redemption (04/15), collectors will receive a generative artwork that is intrinsically linked to their physical pair — I'll explain the concept below.

    Follow this thought →

← Find another starting point